The Investment is Done. Now, It's Time to Deliver on Value Creation
The investment thesis is set. The growth targets are not suggestions. Veritac Group works alongside PE-backed CEOs to build the commercial systems that close the gap between what the investors expect and what the revenue engine can produce.
Trusted by Leading Investors and High-Growth Companies
Partnered with Leading PE Firms and Operators
PE Firms
.png?width=128&height=38&name=trans%20light%20logo%20(1).png){kind=small}
.png?width=96&height=38&name=trans%20light%20logo%20(2).png){kind=small}
Running a PE-Backed Company is Different. Your Growth Targets Reflect That.
The investment thesis didn't account for a fragmented GTM system, a sales team that runs on relationship rather than process, and marketing and sales that can't agree on what a qualified lead looks like. But the revenue target accounted for all of that working properly.
You are not leading a company that can grow on its own timeline. You have a board with expectations tied to an investment thesis, a find with a holding-period clock, and a team that may have been built for a smaller version of the company than the one you are now responsible for running.
Most PE-backed CEOs understand this intellectually. The harder part is that the commercial infrastructure required to deliver at PE pace: a systematic ICP, a pipeline the board trusts, aligned marketing and sales, and a customer success motion that protects NRR. In most PE-backed companies, these were never built before the investment closed. You inherited what existed. Now you have to build what is required, and quickly.
Veritac Group works alongside PE-backed CEOs as an embedded execution partner, not an advisor who delivers recommendations and moves on. Our Managing Partners have held CEO, CMO, CRO, CSO, and COO roles at PE-backed companies. They know what your board expects, how PE-reporting works, and what the commercial system needs to look like for the investment thesis to be defensible at exit.
The engagement model is build-to-transfer. Veritac embeds, builds the system, trains the team, and exits when the revenue engine runs without outside support. What we leave behind is a commercial infrastructure your team owns, without a dependency on us.
Six Situations Where PE-Backed CEOs Bring in Veritac Group
These are the most common moments when a PE-backed CEO (or operating partner) decides the commercial system needs outside help, and where Veritac Group's operator model produces the fastest impact.
GTM System Aligned to Value Creation Plan
The transaction recently closed, and you need to build a GTM system aligned to the value creation plan before the first board review reveals gaps.
Growth Isn't To Forecast
You are 6 to 12 months into the hold, and the growth is behind the investment thesis, and you cannot clearly name why.
Open Growth Executive Seat
Your CMO, CRO, or VP-Sales seat is open, and you need senior commercial leadership in place before you can afford to wait for the full-time search to close.
Department Misalignment
Marketing and Sales are performing against their own metrics but the combined revenue number is consistently short, and nobody owns the system that connects them.
Data-Driven Commercial Model
Your board expects a repeatable, data-grounded commercial model, and what you currently have is a collection of individual relationships and a CRM nobody trusts.
System Over Individual Heroics
You are preparing for the next exit, and the revenue engine needs to look systematic, scalable, and demonstrably repeatable to a buyer in diligence.
The APRO™ Framework: From Day One to a Commercial System the Board Trusts
Veritac Group engagements follow the APRO™ Framework: Analyze, Prioritize, Run, Optimize. The Framework is structured for PE-backed timelines where 90 days matter and "we'll revisit this next quarter" is not an option.
Assess the gap between your investment thesis's growth assumption and what the current commercial system can actually produce. ICP accuracy, pipeline quality, sales-marketing alignement, CRM trust, and forecast reliability are all measured against the board's expectations.
Days 1–21
Rank the commercial interventions that will move your board number fastest. Build a sequenced 90-day execution roadmap with dfefined milestones, owner assignments, and the three metrics your investors will track. The sequence matters even more than the list.
Days 15–45
Embed with your team and execute. Rebuild the ICP. Fix the CRM. Stand up demand gen. Align marketing and sales. Install fractional leadership where the seat is open. Build alongside your team.
Days 21–90+
Build the reporting framework that shows investors a functioning commercial system: pipeline accuracy, conversion metrics, NRR, CAC/LTV, and forecast consistency. Institutionalize the playbook. Exit when the system runs without us.
Ongoing
Six Commercial Systems PE-Backed CEOs Need Most.
Every engagement is scoped to your specific situation. These are the commercial systems that most commonly move the board number for PE-backed companies in the $10M - $300M range.
ICP Rebuild from Your Best Customers
Your ICP was probably built before the investment closed. Many existing ICPs are developed on aspiration, not data. We rebuild it from the behavioral patterns of your closed-won customers. This changes targeting, messaging, and pipeline qualification at the same time. Everything else in the commercial system depends upon this being accurate.
RevOps Infrastructure
CRM architecture, pipeline stage gates, lead scoring and attribution - all built so the leadership team and board can see a pipeline they trust, a forecast they can plan against, and commercial metrics that tell one coherent story. This brings together three separate function updates that don't align (sales, marketing, customer success).
Demand Generation That Feeds the Pipeline
A demand gen system built for your ICP and your competitive context, not a generic marketing plan. It measures what produces a qualified pipeline, not what produces marketing activity. You need a pipeline the sales team wants to work, not volume that looks good in a deck.
Fractional Executive Coverage
CMO, CRO, or CSO seat open? Prefer to call it a VP? We deploy fractional operators - former executives who have run these functions at PE-backed companies, so the commercial motion does not stall while the full-time search runs. We are PE-fluent and available on short notice.
Exit-Ready Commercial Documentation
A systematic, documented GTM system that holds up in buyer diligence, including ICP definition, playbook, process documentation, measurement framework and a commercial story grounded in repeatable revenue. The difference between a great exit and a discounted one is often this documentation.
What Happens When the Revenue Engine Works
"VeritacGroup gave us both a strategy and a seasoned leader who executed it. They helped us align sales and marketing, improve lead quality, and double our growth rate."
- CEO, PE-Backed Health Tech Company
95% Revenue Growth in 6 Months
PE-Backed SaaS company
Situation: Three consecutive quarters of missed targets. The lead investor was losing patience.
Action: Veritac Group diagnosed the problem as an ICP and pipeline architecture failure, not a sales execution failure. We rebuilt the ICP from closed-won data, implemented CRM stage gates, and restructured the coaching cadence from deal inspection to rep development.
Result: The revenue hit forecast for the first time in a year inside a single operating quarter. In 6 months, there was a 95% increase in revenue growth.
$9M to $50M and an Exit
A PE-backed Medical Device company.
Situation: Capital burning, entrenched competitor, 2-5 year sales cycles, price discounting. The CEO needed a GTM system that could compress acquisition time without discounting the price.
Action: Veritac Group rebuilt ICP targeting around buyer behavior, replaced feature messaging with clinical outcomes positioning, and focused the national sales force on highest-probability accounts.
Result: Revenue scaled from $9M to $50M, and the company exited to a larger PE Group.
What PE-Backed CEOs and Operating Partners Ask Us
How is Veritac Group different from a transitional management consulting firm?
Traditional consulting firms deliver strategy decks and exit. Veritac Group embeds with your team and runs the execution. Our managing partners have held CEO, CMO, CRO, CSO, and COO seats at PE-backed companies. They have been accountable to PE boards for revenue numbers they had to hit under the same pressure you are operating under now. They do not advise from a distance. They sit in the seat alongside your senior team.
How quickly can Veritac Group deploy?
We deploy in days or weeks, not months. Most Veritac Group engagements begin in the diagnostic phase within two to three weeks of the engagement. Initial commercial improvements are typically visible within 30 days. Measurable impact on the company metrics, including pipeline accuracy, conversion rates, and forecast reliability, appears within 90 to 120 days. The APRO™ Framework is designed for PE-backed timelines where waiting costs quarters to go by.
What if I already have a CMO and/or a VP of Sales? Do I still need Veritac Group?
Maybe not. If your commercial leadership is delivering what the board needs, the answer is no. But if your marketing and sales leaders are both performing against their own metrics while the combined revenue number consistently misses, the problem is not in either function individually; it is the system that connects them. That is what Veritac Group diagnoses and fixes. We complement your existing leadership; we do not replace it.
How does Veritac Group measure success?
Veritac Group measures success the same way your board does: revenue growth rate, pipeline accuracy and forecast reliability, marketing-sales conversion, net revenue retention, and CAC/LTV ratio. We establish the measurement framework in the first 30 days and report against it in the same board-ready format your investors use. The goal is not a successful engagement. It is a commercial system that demonstrably performs.
What does the engagement look like at the end?
Veritac exits when the system runs without us. What we leave behind: a rebuilt ICP embedded in CRM and sales process, a documented GTM playbook for onboarding and consistency, a demand gen engine the team operates, a revenue reporting framework the board trusts, and a team trained to run and optimize the system independently. The engagement model is build-to-transfer, not build-to-depend.
Also, we don't ask for long contracts but work month-to-month. We are confident in our ability to deliver and recognize that if your company gets acquired, you may have to go in another direction. We can pivot with you or stop at the end of the month.
The Board Meeting is Coming. Let's Make Sure the Number is Ready.
Every Veritac Group engagement starts with an honest conversation about where the commercial system is today and what it needs to deliver the investment thesis. No pitch. No obligation. Just a direct assessment from operators who have been in your shoes.
